How many of you have heard of the income distribution
strategy? I am sure many have heard of a budget, but not many have heard of
income distribution. That’s because income distribution is a strategy, not an
allotment of money separated into small piles dedicated for specific expenses.
There is a vast difference between a budget and an income strategy.
Let me give you a short history lesson on the word budget
and its origin. The word budget is delivered from the Latin word bugla which translated means “little
bag.” Therefore, think of a budget as a series of little bags where money is
placed for future expenses. The concept is one of setting money aside with the
expressed intent of spending it.
In contrast, a strategy is designed to accomplish a specific
goal, usually one that has positive results for the person executing it. In
reality, expenses are only a small part of the income distribution strategy, as
you will see below.
There are four basic goals to achieve when executing an
income distribution strategy. Those goals are to meet the requirements of
Obligations, Necessities, Commitments, and Everything Else. Since some of you
might be reading this for the first time, let me explain these four
requirements of the income distribution strategy.
Obligations are those things for which a person should
consider top priority. These include income taxes, retirement savings,
healthcare needs, and additional savings and investments. These are not listed
in any order or precedence.
Necessities are those things for which a person requires in
order to remain healthy and secure. These include food, clothing, shelter,
utilities, and transportation. These too, are not listed in any order or
precedence.
Commitments are those things for which a person, either
through decision or force, must comply or adverse consequences would arise.
These can be court ordered, such as alimony, child support, or other legal
judgements or self-imposed, such as credit card debt, mortgages, and personal loans
or other financial commitments. Order of precedence would be legal first and
self-imposed last.
Everything Else are those things for which a person desires
to have that do not fall within the parameters of the first three requirements.
The list is endless, therefore if it is not mentioned above, consider it
everything else.
Let’s quickly see how observant you are. How many times
would you have to adopt this strategy before your financial future began to
change? I’ll let you ruminate on that question as I continue to highlight the
details of the income distribution strategy.
Although each requirement has its own bulga within it, the difference between a budget and a strategy is
a strategy is going somewhere, whereas a budget is waiting to be spent. A strategy
is setting a priority structure that can only be violated at the peril of the
one executing it. A budget typically is reactionary to the shifting sands of
other people’s demands upon it.
Visually, the income distribution strategy appears as the following.
This image shows the priority structure in the proper order
reading from left to right. You should always try to maintain the priority
structure. However, there are times when you will be forced to suspend the
priority due to the contraction of your own personal economy. When that
happens, suspend only those parts that do not cause detrimental personal
impacts, such as retirement savings, additional savings and investments, and if
possible, healthcare savings.
These should only be suspended after you have restricted
spending on everything else and some self-imposed commitments. If your
contracting economy is not due to a job loss, then take on a second job until
the threat has abated. The goal is to keep the strategy flexible so it can
provide you with the maximum benefit in all economies.
The “necessities” requirement is where you would find a
basic budget or the Bulga of your
strategy. The money committed to this requirement is set aside to be spent on
known or expected expenses. In the beginning it is a large part of your overall
strategy, but in time, it will become a smaller and smaller portion. Resources
in the “obligations” requirement keeps you safe from the IRS and protected in
retirement as well as in emergency situations.
Resources in the “necessities” requirement provides a level
of security and comfort, which is necessary to maintain good physical and
mental health. Resources in the “everything else” requirement allows you to
experience some of the pleasures of life without jeopardizing your security and
comfort. This strategy creates balance within your financial economies that
actually reduces the stress associated with maintaining a traditional budget.
Remember this question: How many times would you have to
adopt this strategy before your financial future began to change? The answer is
found in the first letter of each requirement. O.N.C.E. Once you implement this
strategic income distribution process, your financial future will forever be
changed. If you are successful at the implementation and continual application
of the principles of this strategy, you will forever change the way you
approach financial decisions.
The ultimate goal of an income distribution strategy is to
move from O.N.C.E. to O.N.E. You want to eventually get rid of the third
requirement known as Commitment. No legal judgements and self-imposed debt.
Then your life and financial future will be forever changed. All of the
financial resources that were used to support your commitments can be directed
to your obligations first, because that is priority.
If at some point in the future you decide to live a little
better than you have been in the area of your necessities, then you will have
the ability to do so. However, increasing your retirement, healthcare, and
additional savings and investments will ensure you have the things you want,
when you want, without worrying about if it will impact your near-term future
or retirement.